Una Aproximación Socio-técnica a la Evaluación de un Expediente Médico Electrónico implementado en Servicios de Salud Públicos de Aguascalientes

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.41.2.3

Palabras clave:

Ciencia de la información, Administración de las Tecnologías de la Información, Informática médica, Ciencia de la implementación, Atención primaria de salud

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue explorar una estrategia para la evaluación de un Expediente Clínico Electrónico (ECE) implementado en servicios de salud públicos de Aguascalientes, México. Se adaptó al español un cuestionario basado en el Modelo de Éxito de Sistemas de Información (MISS) de DeLone y McLean y se aplicó a 62 médicos de atención primaria que trabajan en centros de salud del Instituto de Servicios de Salud del Estado de Aguascalientes (ISSEA). Se exploraron también las oportunidades de mejora del ECE desde la perspectiva de los informantes. Además, se analizaron las relaciones entre los componentes del MISS mediante el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM). Algunos componentes del MISS e items particulares mostraron promedios bajos (p.ej., calidad del servicio y satisfacción) que reflejan algunas oportunidades de mejora en el desarrollo e implementación del ECE, como la necesidad de una actualización continua de la información sobre diagnósticos y catálogos de medicamentos; y el desarrollo de sistemas de interoperabilidad con el segundo y tercer nivel de atención. En conclusión, el presente estudio contribuye en la generación de evidencia sobre el uso del MISS para evaluar los sistemas de EMR en servicios de salud públicos de México. Se debe generar más evidencia en este campo para promover la mejora continua de estos sistemas de información.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

World Health Organization. e-Health (WHA58.28). In: Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly (WHA58/2005/REC/1) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2005. p. 108–10. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/20398

World Health Organization. mHealth, use of appropriate digital technologies for public health. Report by the Director-General. In: Seventy-first World Health Assembly - Provisional agenda item 124 (A71/20) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. p. 26. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/e/e_wha71.html

World Health Organization. Digital Health. In: Seventy-first World Health Assembly - Agenda item 124 (A71/A/CONF/1) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. p. 21. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/e/e_wha71.html

World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening [Internet]. Geneva:WHO; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/digital-interventions-health-system-strengthening/en/

Aceto G, Persico V, Pescapé A. The role of Information and Communication Technologies in healthcare: taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges. J Netw Comput Appl [Internet]. 2018;107:125–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.008

Mettler T, Raptis DA. What constitutes the field of health information systems? Fostering a systematic framework and research agenda. Health Informatics J [Internet]. 2012;18(2):147–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458212452496

Barrett D, Liaw S-T, De Lusignan S. Unravelling the tangled taxonomies of health informatics. J Innov Heal Informatics [Internet]. 2014;21(3):152–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.78

Boogerd EA, Arts T, Engelen LJ, van de Belt TH. “What is eHealth”: time for an update? JMIR Res Protoc [Internet]. 2015;4(1):e29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4065

Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a Conceptual Model for eHealth: Qualitative Study with Key Informants. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2017;19(10):e324. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8106

Elbert NJ, Van Os-Medendorp H, Van Renselaar W, Ekeland AG, Hakkaart-Van Roijen L, Raat H, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2014;16(4):e110. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2790

Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2015;(9):CD002098. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2

Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017;12(2):e0170581. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170581

Totten AM, Womack DM, Eden KB, McDonagh MS, Griffin JC, Grusing S, et al. Telehealth: mapping the evidence for patient outcomes from systematic reviews [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Available from: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm

World Health Organization. Atlas of eHealth country profiles: the use of eHealth in support of universal health coverage, based on the findings of the third global survey on eHealth 2015 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/atlas_2015/en/

World Health Organization, International Telecommunication Union. National eHealth Strategy Toolkit [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75211

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Estrategia y plan de acción sobre eSalud (2012-2017) [Strategy and plan of action on eHealth 2012-2017] [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.paho.org/ict4health/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=54:estrategia-y-plan-de-accion-sobre-esalud-2012-2017&Itemid=&lang=es

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La eSalud en la región de las américas : derribando las barreras a la implementación. Resultados de la Tercera Encuesta Global de eSalud de la Organización Mundial de la Salud [eHealth in the Americas region: breaking down the barriers to implementation. Results of the Third Global Survey on eHealth of the World Health Organization] [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2016. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/31287

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Improving Health Sector efficiency: The Role of Information and Communication Technologies. Paris: OECD; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264084612-en

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Salud electrónica en América Latina y el Caribe: avances y desafíos [Electronic health in Latin America and the Caribbean: progress and challenges] [Internet]. Fernández A, Oviedo E, editors. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Naciones Unidas; 2010. Available from: https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/salud-electronica-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-avances-y-desafios

Palacios J, Flores-Roux E, García Zaballos A. Diagnóstico del sector TIC en México, Conectividad e inclusión social para la mejora de la productividad y el crecimiento económico [Diagnosis of the ICT sector in Mexico, Connectivity and social inclusion for the improvement of productivity and economic growth] [Internet]. Documento de debate IDB-DP-235. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID); 2013. Available from: https://publications.iadb.org/es/diagnostico-del-sector-tic-en-mexico-conectividad-e-inclusion-social-para-la-mejora-de-la

World Health Organization. Classification of Digital Health Interventions v 1.0, a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260480

Díaz de León-Castañeda C. Electronic health (e-Health): a conceptual framework for its implementation in health services facilities. Gac Med Mex [Internet]. 2019;155(2):161–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M19000251

Glasgow RE, Phillips SM, Sanchez MA. Implementation science approaches for integrating eHealth research into practice and policy. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2014 Jul;83(7):e1–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.07.002

Bergmo T. How to measure costs and benefits of eHealth interventions: An overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2015;17(11):e254. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4521

McNamee P, Murray E, Kelly MP, Bojke L, Chilcott J, Fischer A, et al. Designing and Undertaking a Health Economics Study of Digital Health Interventions. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2016;51(5):852–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.007

Yusof MM, Papazafeiropoulou A, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK. Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2008;77(6):377–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004

Delone W, Mclean E. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. J Manag Inf Syst [Internet]. 2003;19(4):9–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Gómez-Dantés O, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H FJ. Sistema de Salud de México [Mexico Health System]. Salud Publica Mex [Internet]. 2011;53(supl 2):S220–32. Available from: http://saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/5043/10023

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Encuesta Intercensal 2015 [Intercensal Survey 2015] [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/enchogares/especiales/intercensal/

Diario Oficial de la Federación. DECRETO por el que se reforman, adicionan y derogan diversas disposiciones de la Ley General de Salud y de la Ley de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud [DECREE by which various directions of the General Health Law and the Law of the National Institutes of Health are reformed, added and repealed] [Internet]. 2019 Nov 29; Available from: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5580430&fecha=29/11/2019

Gobierno Federal. Estrategia Digital Nacional [National Digital Strategy] [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/17083/Estrategia_Digital_Nacional.pdf

Mariscal Avilés J, Gil-García JR, Ramírez-Hernández F. E-Salud en México: antecedentes, objetivos, logros y retos [E-Health in Mexico: background, objectives, achievements and challenges]. Espac Públicos [Internet]. 2012;15(34):65–94. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67623463015

Gertrudiz N. e-Health: the case of Mexico [e-Health: the case of Mexico]. Lat Am J Telehealth [Internet]. 2010;2(2):127–67. Available from: http://cetes.medicina.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/rlat/article/view/71

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Conversaciones sobre eSalud. Gestión de información, diálogos e intercambio de conocimientos para acercarnos al acceso universal a la salud [Conversations about eHealth. Information management, dialogues and knowledge exchange to get closer to universal access to health] [Internet]. Washington, DC: OPS; 2014. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/28391

González-Rétiz ML, Pacheco-López A. Desarrollo de la telesalud en México [Development of telehealth in Mexico] [Internet]. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Naciones Unidas; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11362/4055

Vélez-Andrade C, Rodríguez-Hernández J. Salud Móvil: Nuevos Horizontes para la Promoción de la Salud. Proyecto m-Salud para la prevención, diagnóstico oportuno y control del sobrepeso/obesidad y diabetes tipo 2 [Mobile Health: New Horizons for Health Promotion. m-Health Project for the prevention, timely diagnosis and control of overweight / obesity and type 2 diabetes]. México City: Fundación Mexicana para la Salud (Funsalud); 2018. Available from: https://funsalud.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Salud-Movil_-Nuevos-Horizontes-para-la-Promocion-de-la-Salud.pdf

Cabrera NI, Castro P, Demeneghi VP, Fernández L, Morales J, Sainz L, et al. mSalUV: un nuevo sistema de mensajería móvil para el control de la diabetes en México [mSalUV: a new mobile messaging system for diabetes control in Mexico]. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Internet]. 2014;35(5–6):371–7. Available from: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/2014.v35n5-6/371-377

Tapia-Conyer R, Gallardo-Rincón H, Saucedo-Martinez R. CASALUD: An innovative health-care system to control and prevent non-communicable diseases in Mexico. Perspect Public Health [Internet]. 2015;135(4):180–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757913913511423

Tapia-Conyer R, Saucedo-Martinez R, Mujica-Rosales R, Gallardo-Rincon H, Campos-Rivera PA, Lee E, et al. Enablers and inhibitors of the implementation of the Casalud Model, a Mexican innovative healthcare model for non-communicable disease prevention and control. Heal Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2016;14(1):1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0125-0

Gallardo-Rincón H, Saucedo-Martínez R, Mujica-Rosales R, Lee EM, Israel A, Torres-Beltran B, et al. Online continuing medical education as a key link for successful noncommunicable disease self‑management: The CASALUDTM Model. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther [Internet]. 2017;10:443–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S137891

Hernández-Ávila JE, Palacio-Mejía LS, Lara-Esqueda A, Silvestre E, Agudelo-Botero M, Diana ML, et al. Assessing the process of designing and implementing electronic health records in a statewide public health system: The case of Colima, Mexico. J Am Med Informatics Assoc [Internet]. 2013;20(2):238–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000907

González-Block M, Lopez-Santibañez C, Aguilera Aburto N, Aldama A, Barajas M, Becerril Montekio V, et al. Evaluación y estrategias de portabilidad y convergencia hacia la integracion del Sistema Nacional de Salud, resumen ejecutivo [Evaluation and strategies of portability and convergence towards the integration of the National Health System, Executive summary] [Internet]. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2011. Available from: http://pliopencms05.salud.gob.mx:8080/BasesCDI/Archivos/Informes/portabilidad_convergencia.pdf

Fernández Morales K, McAnally Salas L, Vallejo Casarín A. Apropiación tecnológica: una visión desde los modelos y las teorías que la explican [Technological appropriation: a view from the models and theories that explain it]. Perspect Educ [Internet]. 2015;54(2):109–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.54-Iss.2-Art.331

Korpelainen K. Theories of ICT system implementation and adoption - a critical review [Internet]. Helsinki: School of Science and Technology, Aalto University; 2011. Available from: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/5019

Yu P, Qian S. Developing a theoretical model and questionnaire survey instrument to measure the success of electronic health records in residential aged care. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018;13(1):e0190749. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190749

Tharmalingam S, Hagens S, Zelmer J. The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health record users in Canada. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2016;16(1):93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0330-3

Raymond L, Paré G, Ortiz de Guinea A, Poba-Nzaou P, Trudel M-C, Marsan J, et al. Improving performance in medical practices through the extended use of electronic medical record systems: a survey of Canadian family physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2015;15(1):27. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0152-8

Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: Approach, results, and success factors. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2013;82(10):940–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.010

Messeri P, Khan S, Millery M, Campbell A, Merrill J, Shih S, et al. An Information Systems Model of the Determinants of Electronic Health Record Use. Appl Clin Inform [Internet]. 2013;4(2):185–200. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-01-RA-0005

Alharthi H, Youssef A, Radwan S, Al-Muallim S, Zainab A-T. Physician satisfaction with electronic medical records in a major Saudi Government hospital. J Taibah Univ Med Sci [Internet]. 2014;9(3):213–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.01.004

Tzeng WS, Kuo KM, Lin HW, Chen TY. A Socio-technical assessment of the success of picture archiving and communication systems: The radiology technologist’s perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2013;13(1):1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-109

Sicotte C, Paré G, Bini KK, Moreault M-P, Laverdure G. Virtual Organization of Hospital Medical Imaging: A User Satisfaction Survey. J Digit Imaging [Internet]. 2010;23(6):689–700. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9220-x

Paré G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, Sicotte C. Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care [Internet]. 2005;21(4):471–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050658

Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014. 282 p.

Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL). Información de Pobreza y Evaluación de las Entidades Federativas [Poverty Information and Evaluation of the Federal Entities] [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.coneval.org.mx/coordinacion/entidades/Paginas/inicioent.aspx

Secretaría de Salud. Portal de datos abiertos de Secretaría de Salud [Open data portal of the Ministry of Health] [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://datos.gob.mx/busca/organization/salud

Díaz de León Castañeda C, Góngora Ortega J. eSalud en servicios de salud públicos en México: estudio de caso [E-Health in Public Health Services in Mexico: Case Study]. Región y Soc [Internet]. 2020;32:e1256. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2020/32/1256

Canada Health Infoway. System and use assessment survey (refresh february 2015) [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/resources/toolkits/change-management/national-framework/monitoring-and-evaluation/resources-and-tools/991-benefits-evaluation-survey-process-system-use-assessment-survey?Itemid=101

Lau F, Hagens S, Muttitt S. A proposed benefits evaluation framework for health information systems in Canada. Healthc Q [Internet]. 2007;10(1):113–8. Available from: https://www.longwoods.com/content/18657

Stata 25 Software. Structural Equations Modelling Reference Manual [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.stata.com/bookstore/structural-equation-modeling-reference-manual/

Fundación Carlos Slim. Programas de Innovación [Innovation programs] [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.salud.carlosslim.org/innovacion/

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA, APA, NCME; 2014. 230 p.

Buabbas AJ, Al-Shamali DA, Sharma P, Haidar S, Al-Shawaf H. Users’ Perspectives on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): An In-Depth Study in a Teaching Hospital in Kuwait. JMIR Med Informatics [Internet]. 2016;4(2):e21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5703

Otieno GO, Hinako T, Motohiro A, Daisuke K, Keiko N. Measuring effectiveness of electronic medical records systems: Towards building a composite index for benchmarking hospitals. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2008;77(10):657–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462305050658

Kuo K, Liu C, Talley PC, Pan S. Strategic Improvement for Quality and Satisfaction of Hospital Information Systems. J Healthc Eng [Internet]. 2018:1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3689618

Cohen JF, Coleman E, Kangethe MJ. An importance-performance analysis of hospital information system attributes: A nurses’ perspective. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2016;86:82–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010

Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol [Internet]. 2015;3(1):32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9

Lau F, Kuziemsky C, Price M, Gardner J. A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Informatics Assoc [Internet]. 2010;17(5):637–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.004838

Descargas

Publicado

2020-07-16

Cómo citar

Díaz de León, C. (2020). Una Aproximación Socio-técnica a la Evaluación de un Expediente Médico Electrónico implementado en Servicios de Salud Públicos de Aguascalientes. Revista Mexicana De Ingenieria Biomedica, 41(2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.41.2.3

Número

Sección

Artículos de Investigación

Citas Dimensions

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.